Chat with us, powered by LiveChat This project is divided into three main parts, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These different parts are: Problem Identification, Intervention Strategy, and Closing | excelpaper.org/
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

 

This project is divided into three main parts, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These different parts are: Problem Identification, Intervention Strategy, and Closing Statement.

Prompt

Your grant proposal must be 8-12 pages in length (plus your works cited page) and must be written in MLA or APA format. Include at least 8 academic journal sources cited in the proper format, along with the insertion and analysis of a visual source.

The grant proposal will contain the critical elements listed below.

I. Problem Identification: Research and identify resources for a specific issue that needs to be corrected (5-7 pages – at least two pages per subpoint). The issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.

a. Prevalence: 

i. What is the issue you have chosen to address? Define what makes your chosen issue a problem for the given community? What data do you have that points to the prevalence of this issue?

b. Assessment of Resources: Evaluate available and needed resources in your community.

i. Evaluate the resources available for providing a program or service to address the problem.

c. Impact of the problem: Describe the impact of the problem on individuals, families, and the community. Construct an impact statement on the prevalence of the identified issue and the lack of community resources.

i. Articulate how the prevalence of the problem has an impact on the community.

ii. How is the lack of available resources exacerbating the issue?

II. Intervention Strategy: This section examines why your proposal will address the problem discussed. It should use various rhetorical techniques to convince and persuade the audience that what you are proposing will address the issue (4-5 pages).

In your submission, be sure to include the critical elements listed below:

§ Research and justify the selection of a theoretically supported and effective intervention strategy for addressing the target issue.

· Efficacy: Analyze and critique at least two established intervention strategies for inconsistencies and effectiveness.

i. Critically examine intervention strategies for consistency. 

ii. How effective were these strategies in addressing their respective issues? To what extent would these intervention strategies address the issue identified in your community? 

· Selection: Select a strategy and justify your selection based on its effectiveness and the individual, familial, environmental, cultural, and political factors.

III.   Closing Statement: Conclude your grant proposal with careful attention to the audience you must convince.

English 1302 Grant Proposal Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

The final project is the creation of a grant proposal that proposes a solution to a problem faced by a community or group to which you belong, and address your proposal to anyone who might help solve the problem.

The assessment for this course will be the construction of a grant proposal that targets a current need. The overall assessment will demonstrate your ability not only to conduct research, but to think critically. Specifically, through your writing you must demonstrate your ability to address the following competencies:

Critical Thinking:

·
Explanation of issues: Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding

·
Evidence: Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.

·
Influence of context and assumptions: Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.

·
Your position: Specific position is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within position.

·
Conclusions and related outcomes: Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect your informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Additionally, your essay must demonstrate the components of
written composition:

·
Context of and Purpose for Writing: Demonstrate a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose of a textual analysis.

·
Content Development: Use appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the idea of critical thinking.

·
Genre and Disciplinary Conventions: Properly format and organize the essay in MLA/APA style.

·
Sources and Evidence: Incorporate at least two citations in each paragraph from at least two library database sources.

·
Control of Syntax and Mechanics: Use graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, making almost no errors.

The project will be broken up into different sections throughout the semester and at the end you will combine each section into one complete paper. Please make sure to use appropriate headings in this paper.

Some examples of grant proposa

error: Content is protected !!