Chat with us, powered by LiveChat The purpose of this assignment is to distinguish health economics from other forms of economic study. Write a 500-750 word essay addressing the following criteria: Analyze the differences and similarities between health economics and other forms of econ | excelpaper.org/
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

 

The purpose of this assignment is to distinguish health economics from other forms of economic study.

Write a 500-750 word essay addressing the following criteria:

  1. Analyze the differences and similarities between health economics and other forms of economic study.
  2. Choose a health care organization or entity (e.g., hospital, nonprofit medical clinic, physician office, pediatric specialty clinic, optometry office).
  3. Describe the following economic terms in the context of the selected organization or entity: Scarcity, Opportunity Costs, Marginal Analysis, Supply and Demand, Competition, Efficiency, and Market Failure.

Use two or three peer-reviewed scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. 

5

EMTALA Scenario Analysis

Adetutu Adeparusi

HLT-520-Legal and Ethics Issues in Health Care

Grand Canyon University

Karen Rice

Running head: ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE

1

March 10th, 2021.

EMTALA Scenario Analysis

According to (Zibulewsky 2001) in
Baylor University Medical Centre Proceedings. EMTALA is a health act instituted back in 1986 as a section of the consolidated omnibus budget reconciliation act. Originally, the law intended to facilitate access to health facilities for patients and minimize patient dumping risk. As argued by (Tammy_RN 2019) in
AJN, American Journal of Nursing, patient dumping is the act of transferring a patient from a hospital of a higher standard in the form of equipment and services to a lower standard facility due to financial inadequacy. Before forming EMTALA, patients in private hospitals who could not afford the billing cost would be transferred to public hospitals. However, the medical staff knew the patients would not get any medical assistance in that facility.

EMTALA demands that the emergency response team provide medical examinations to anyone who enters the facility. Equality is championed in the act since medical screening is performed on anyone regardless of their citizenship, race, gender, and financial status. A hospital is expected to stabilize a patient in the facility without requesting a transfer to another health facility. The law allows for interhospital transfers only when their independent consent from the patient or the hospital lacks the specific equipment required for the s stabilization of the patient. The refusal to provide healthcare for people who are capable of raising the hospital bills is highly discouraged. (Zibulewsky, 2001) as outlined in
Baylor University Medical Centre Proceedings. It is illegal to deny a patient the request for an examination or treatment in a health facility.

In the assignment scenario case, the patient had checked in hospital B with a severed ear. Since the health facility is not equipped with an ENT physician, the emergency department physician could only stabilize the injury. At the same time, the patient waits for specialized health care from an ENT physician. (Zibulewsky, 2001), as argued in
Baylor University Medical Centre Proceedings, on-call medical staff are responsible for providing emergency care as

EMTALA Scenario Analysis

requested by the emergency department physician. The ED send a recording of the patient, whereby on analysis, the ENT physician ascertained that the injury was salvageable and could be easily sutured. In my opinion, the hospital administrator would not have violated the EMTALA by rejecting the trans

error: Content is protected !!