Chat with us, powered by LiveChat urgent 1 | excelpaper.org/
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Need in 24 hours

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction
and
conclusion

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The introduction is
succinct and embodies
the project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes. The
introduction constructs
the purpose of the
system. A compelling
and justifiable
conclusion is developed
that supports the key
outcomes. More than 5
scholarly sources and
500 words combined.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The introduction and
conclusion are succinct
and embody most of the
project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes, and/or the
introduction constructs
an unclear purpose of
the system. Justified
conclusion developed.
Minimum of 5 scholarly
sources and 500 words.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The introduction and/or
conclusion are
generalized and embody
some of the project’s
primary objectives and
outcomes and/or has
less than the minimum
of 5 scholarly sources
and 500 words and/or is
not defensible.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially
unmet or not
present

10 pts

Literature
review and
systems
design
methods

50 to >45.0 pts

Advanced

Systems analysis and
design literature review
and methodology is
accurate, feasible, and
addresses the key
deliverables of the
project including a
highly innovative,
available, scalable, and
secure information
systems cloud solution.
Literature results and
methods are properly
contrasted and are
specific and relevant to
the problem. They detail
the standards used and
how these will
benchmark the
systems. Over 2,000
words and 15 unique
scholarly journal articles
that justify the
methodology, its
reliability, and its validity
in comparing and
contrasting the
information systems.

45 to >41.0 pts

Proficient

Systems analysis and
design literature review
and methodology is
mostly accurate,
feasible, and addresses
the key deliverables of
the project including a
highly innovative,
available, scalable, and
secure information
systems cloud solution
and/or literature results
and methods are
contrasted and
somewhat specific and
relevant to the problem
and/or detail some
standards used and
how these will
benchmark the systems
and/or minimum of
2,000 words and 15
unique scholarly journal
articles that justify the
methodology, its
reliability, and its validity
in comparing and
contrasting the
information systems.

41 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Systems analysis and
design literature review
and methodology is not
always accurate,
feasible, and/or is
missing the key
deliverables of the
project including a highly
innovative, available,
scalable, and secure
information systems
cloud solution and/or
literature results and
methods are not
contrasted and/or not
specific and/or relevant
to the problem and/or
benchmarking is
inadequate and/or less
than 2,000 words and 15
unique scholarly journal
articles that justify the
methodology, its
reliability, and its validity
in comparing and
contrasting the
information systems.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially
unmet or not
present
and/or
quotes more
than 5% of
the writing or
use of
existing
information
system

50

BMIS 530

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 2

Assignment Instructions

Overview

Recall the three stages of the project:
Phase 1: Introduction, problem statement, feasibility study, and project plan

Phase 2: Methodology to compare the old and new systems and the systems analysis

Phase 3: Results of comparison of the old and new systems and the systems design

In Phase 2 you will develop a methods section, similar to a research methods section of a journal article, that highlights the framework and standards you will use to compare the old information system analysis and design to the new information system that is cloud-capable, highly available, scalable, and secure. You will use the methods section as a means to compare the two systems.

Instructions

This report must contain the following elements:
I. See the grading rubric for all minimums.
II. Cover page
III. Table of Contents (TOC)
IV. Every section must be well supported with scholarly information systems journal articles.
V. Introduction and conclusion sections
a. Please update your previous introduction and conclusion sections as appropriate
b. A succinct, high quality, and well supported introduction and conclusion should be written
c. It is necessary to highlight the objectives and conclusions of the project
d. Introduce the primary goals of this particular phase, the coinciding objectives, and the outcomes
e. The conclusion should be the last heading and conclude the current phase and state the upcoming objectives and deliverables in the next phase.
VI. Literature review and systems analysis and design methodology
a. Constructs a well-supported review of literature related to the problem
b. Develops a proper systems analysis and design comparison methodology in which to benchmark and test the information system
c. Details and supports the objective framework(s) and standards that will be used to compare the old and new systems
d. Uses the frameworks’ process accurately
VII. Systems analysis diagrams
a. A minimum of two diagrams (2) are necessary for each required type, one diagram represents the existing system and one diagram represents the new re-designed and improved system
b. The following systems analysis diagrams are required:
i. Use case diagrams for the old system and new system
ii. Written use cases (also known as use case descriptions) for the old system and new system
iii. Activity diagrams for the old system and new system
iv. Sequence diagrams for the old system and new system
c. Screenshots are required for each diagram with a visible operating system date/time and unique desktop element showing that indicates it is your computer
i. No credit will be given for diagrams without screenshots
ii. Include the screenshots in appendices in the project report
d. Describe the systems analysis as you complete it in a narrative form and link in each associated diagram referenced in the narrative using an appendix
e. Each diagram will be assessed accordi

BMIS 530-D01-

Systems Analysis and Redesign: Phase 1

Systems Analysis, Modeling, and Design (D01),

Paruvelli, Praneeth Kumar

Liberty University

James Dollens 2022, July 04

2

Table of Contents

Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3

Problem statement ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

Feasibility Study and Project Plan …………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

Feasibility …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6

Project Schedule ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7

Cost Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7

Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

Reference …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

3

Systems Analysis and Redesign: Phase 1

Introduction

I am currently working on developing a web-based system for my church as part of my

project to analyze and redesign existing computer systems. This will give a solid foundation for

organizing the attendees of the church service in accordance with who arrives first. The strange

behavior that COVID has displayed over the course of the past two years served as inspiration

for the design of this system. Because of the pandemic, the majority of Christians were unable to

attend worship services on Sundays, and they would miss doing so. It is necessary to take many

precautions to ensure people’s safety before they will feel comfortable attending church again.

One of these measures is ensuring compliance with the standards for social distance and the

maximum number of people who are permitted to live in a single house at any given time. In

order to provide assistance with this matter, I devised a system that enables churches to ascertain

the number of vacant seats and enables individuals to register for those vacant seats. In the book

of Isaiah, chapter 43, verse 19, says, “Behold, I am doing something new!” Do you not

acknowledge it now that it has been established? I am currently planning out how I will get

through the wasteland and the streams to get to where I need to go.

Problem Statement

As a result of COVID’s loosening of its rules, an increasing number of churches have

reopened their doors. This has resulted in the difficult situation of determining how

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction
and
conclusion

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The introduction is
succinct and embodies
the project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes. The
introduction constructs
the purpose of the
system. A compelling
and justifiable
conclusion is
developed that
supports the key
outcomes. More than
5 scholarly sources
and 500 words
combined.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The introduction and
conclusion are succinct
and embody most of the
project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes, and/or the
introduction constructs
an unclear purpose of
the system. Justified
conclusion developed.
Minimum of 5 scholarly
sources and 500 words.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The introduction and/or
conclusion are
generalized and embody
some of the project’s
primary objectives and
outcomes and/or has
less than the minimum of
5 scholarly sources and
500 words and/or is not
defensible.

0 pts

Not Present

Substantially
unmet or not
present

10 pts

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 3 Grading Rubric |
BMIS530_D01_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Systems
analysis and
design
comparison
results

40 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

Systems analysis and
design results compare
key benchmarks
including cloud
computing capabilities,
high-availability,
scalability, and level of
security of the old and
newly designed
information systems
using relevant graphs,
tables, and figures. A
detailed process that
follows the selected
computing
methodology,
framework, and uses
the appropriate
standards exists.
There are scholarly
supported comparison
methods to contrast the
systems. Financial
analysis is included
that compares the two
system designs from a
managerial standpoint.
Over 1,500 words and
10 unique scholarly
journal articles from the
literature review that
justify the results and
validity of the
comparative analysis.

36 to >33.0 pts

Proficient

Systems analysis and
design results compare
some benchmarks
including cloud
computing capabilities,
high-availability,
scalability, and level of
security of the old and
newly designed
information systems
using relevant graphs,
tables, and figures
and/or processes that
follow the selected
computing methodology
exist with some
scholarly supported
comparison methods to
contrast the systems
and/or financial analysis
is included that
compares the two
system designs from a
managerial standpoint
and/or there is a
minimum of 1,500 words
and 10 unique scholarly
journal articles from the
literature review that
justify the results and
validity of the
comparative analysis.

33 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Systems analysis and
design results miss
benchmarks including
cloud computing
capabilities,
high-availability,
scalability, and level of
security of the old and
newly designed
information systems
using relevant graphs,
tables, and figures
and/or processes do not
follow the selected
computing methodology
and/or there is
insufficient scholarly
supported comparison
methods to contrast the
systems and/or financial
analysis does

BMIS 530

Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 3

Assignment Instructions

Overview

Recall the three stages of the project:
Phase 1: Introduction, problem statement, feasibility study, and project plan

Phase 2: Methodology to compare the old and new systems and the systems analysis

Phase 3: Results of comparison of the old and new systems and the systems design

In Phase 3 you will use the methodology developed in Phase 2 to compare the old information system analysis and design to the new information system that is cloud-capable, highly available, scalable, and secure. You will use the scholarly supported computing framework and standards (e.g. ANSI, COBIT, ISO, ITU, NIST, HIPAA, PCI) to benchmark the systems analysis and design of the old and new system. Once you perform this comparison, you will detail the results.

Instructions

This report must contain the following elements:
I. See the grading rubric for all minimums.
II. Cover page
III. Table of Contents (TOC)
IV. Every section must be well supported with scholarly information systems journal articles.
V. Introduction and conclusion sections
a. Please update your previous introduction and conclusion sections as appropriate
b. A succinct, high quality, and well supported introduction and conclusion should be written
c. It is necessary to highlight the objectives and conclusions of the project
d. Introduce the primary goals of this particular phase, the coinciding objectives, and the outcomes
e. The conclusion should be the last heading and conclude the current phase and state the upcoming objectives and deliverables in the next phase.
VI. Systems analysis and design results
a. Follows a well-supported methodology including at least one framework and appropriate standards from scholarly journal articles
b. Uses objective standards accurately to benchmark the old system and the new system
c. Minimal comparison elements should include system:
i. Cloud/distributed computing capabilities
ii. High availability
iii. Scalability
iv. Security
v. Note, these are projected based upon the comparative benchmarked standards
d. A final updated financial analysis that projects associated costs of both systems once the final design is completed
e. Discuss the managerial implications of the results
f. Uses excel spreadsheets, graphs, figures, and tables to show the objective comparisons of the systems
VII. Systems design diagrams
a. A minimum of two diagrams (2) are necessary for each required type, one diagram represents the existing system and one diagram represents the new re-designed and improved system
b. The following systems design diagrams are required that compare the old and new systems:
i. Entity relationship data model diagrams
ii. Class diagrams
iii. User interface forms
iv. Distributed computing network and system architecture diagrams
1. Design the complete information system architecture environment for the old and new environments
c. Screenshots are required for each

We offer the best custom paper writing services.  We have done this question before,  we can also do it for you.

Why Choose Us

How It Works

 
error: Content is protected !!