Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification | excelpaper.org/
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Thank you for submitting the assignment to the SafeAssign link! You received a high similarity score (75%). This may be due to not citing or using a reference correctly. Remember that direct quotes should be avoided as they will raise the score. Always paraphrase when possible. 

I suggest that you submit your assignments to SafeAssign as a draft to determine whether you work matches existing sources published elsewhere. You will be provided an opportunity to review these matches and correct them so to lower your similarity results and avoid plagiarism concerns. A good rule of thumb is to review the highlighted areas and ask yourself if you cited correctly. If most of your sentence is highlighted, ask yourself if you need to use direct quotes, or paraphrase it. Once you determine that you are ok, submit the draft to the final submission link for grading. You may submit your assignment to the draft area as many times as you wish, but only once to the final link.

If you have submitted a paper that you used in a previous course, your similarity report may be high, please contact the me. According to Capellaâ��s policy, you may reuse your own previous work; however, please make sure that your assignment matches the grading assignment rubric. Often, recycled assignments do not match.

According to policy, I am to assign a â��non-performanceâ�� for all criteria in the scoring guide and request that you address the issue before submitting your next assignment. In addition, here is a Capella resource that may be helpful: 
https://campus.capella.edu/web/writing-center/sources-and-evidence/quoting
  

Please let me know if you can see the SafeAssign results. While unintentional, continued high similarity matches may result in an Academic Honesty form submission to the school. Please see this as a learning opportunity for future assignments! I wish for your continued success and would like to discuss these results with you. 

Thanks so much!  I

Dr. Michael L. Jones


DOWNLOAD YOUR EVALUATED ASSESSMENT FILE

COMPETENCY 1

Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Notes strategies employed in the interview to ensure that sufficient information was gathered.

Proficient

Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Basic

Discusses an interview, but the focus of the interview, the issues addressed, or the specifics of health care organizational context are unclear or missing.

Non-Performance

Does not summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

CRITERION

Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.

Proficient

Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Basic

Identifies collaborative approaches from the literature but the relevance to establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue is unclear or insufficiently explained.

Non-Performance

Does not describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 2

Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.

CRITERION

Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate, providing one or more specific reasons to justify this approach.

Proficient

Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Basic

Identifies an issue with an unclear connection to the interview or for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach seems inappropriate.

Non-Performance

Does not identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 3

Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

CRITERION

Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.

Proficient

Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Basic

Identifies change theories and leadership strategies that are unclear, incomplete, or irrelevant to developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Non-Performance

Does not describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

COMPETENCY 4

Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

Proficient

Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Basic

Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Non-Performance

Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

Faculty Comments:

Please see overall comments.

CRITERION

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Your result: Non-Performance

Distinguished

Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

Proficient

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Basic

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing.

Non-Performance

Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

error: Content is protected !!